The article discusses the importance of causal inference and evaluates the pure causal reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) using the new CORR2CAUSE dataset. It highlights that current LLMs perform poorly on this task and struggle to develop robust causal inference skills, emphasizing the need to accurately measure and distinguish reasoning abilities from knowledge derived from training data.
“`html
Causation or Coincidence? Evaluating Large Language Models’ Skills in Inference from Correlation
Understanding why things happen, known as causal inference, is a key part of human intelligence. There are two main ways we gain this ability: one is through what we’ve learned from experience, like knowing that touching a hot stove causes burns based on common sense; the other is through pure causal reasoning, where we formally think through and argue about cause and effect using established procedures and rules from the field of causal inference.
Recent studies label Large Language Models (LLMs) as “causal parrots,” highlighting their tendency to echo training data. While many studies assess LLMs’ causal abilities by treating them as knowledge bases, the focus on empirical knowledge overlooks their potential for formal causal reasoning from correlational data.
To evaluate Large Language Models’ (LLMs) pure causal reasoning abilities, researchers from Max Plank, ETH Zurich, University of Michigan, and Meta have introduced the CORR2CAUSE dataset. It is the first dataset specifically designed to assess when it is valid or invalid to infer causation from correlation.
Key Research Questions
- How effectively do current Large Language Models (LLMs) perform on this task?
- Can existing LLMs be retrained or repurposed to develop robust causal inference skills for this task?
Through extensive experiments, the researchers empirically demonstrate that none of the seventeen investigated LLMs excel in this pure causal inference task. Additionally, they show that while LLMs can exhibit improved performance after fine-tuning, the acquired causal inference skills lack robustness.
To prevent potential issues associated with Goodhart’s law, researchers suggest using this dataset to assess the pure causal inference skills of LLMs that have not been exposed to it. Acknowledging the current limitations in the reasoning abilities of LLMs and the challenge of distinguishing genuine reasoning from knowledge derived from training data, the authors further emphasize the importance of focusing on efforts within the community to accurately disentangle and measure both abilities.
AI Solutions for Middle Managers
If you want to evolve your company with AI, stay competitive, and use Causation or Coincidence? Evaluating Large Language Models’ Skills in Inference from Correlation to your advantage, consider the following practical AI solutions:
- Identify Automation Opportunities: Locate key customer interaction points that can benefit from AI.
- Define KPIs: Ensure your AI endeavors have measurable impacts on business outcomes.
- Select an AI Solution: Choose tools that align with your needs and provide customization.
- Implement Gradually: Start with a pilot, gather data, and expand AI usage judiciously.
For AI KPI management advice, connect with us at hello@itinai.com. For continuous insights into leveraging AI, stay tuned on our Telegram Channel or Twitter.
Spotlight on a Practical AI Solution
Consider the AI Sales Bot from itinai.com/aisalesbot designed to automate customer engagement 24/7 and manage interactions across all customer journey stages.
Discover how AI can redefine your sales processes and customer engagement. Explore solutions at itinai.com.
“`
List of Useful Links:
- AI Lab in Telegram @aiscrumbot – free consultation
- Causation or Coincidence? Evaluating Large Language Models’ Skills in Inference from Correlation
- MarkTechPost
- Twitter – @itinaicom
